1 2025:CGHC:28820 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5946 of 2025 1 - Smt. Shradha Sharma W/o Shri Vivek Sharma Aged About 47 Years R/o Qtr. No. D-27, Balco, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Directorate of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 6 - Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Ghurdewa, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede and Mr. Aniruddh Singh, Advocates. For State-Respondents : Mr. K.S. Saini, Panel Lawyers. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 27-06-2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner(s) is/are challenging the impugned transfer order(s) and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner(s) has/have been declared surplus Teacher(s) and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) would submit that the petitioner has not joined at her transferred place. It is further submitted that the list of surplus Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner(s) and if the petitioner(s) is/are not granted interim relief, he/she/they will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned order(s) is/are liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioner(s) has/have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioner(s) is/are having any grievance, he/she/they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his/her/their representation(s) in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner(s) is/are directed to make fresh representation(s) before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today and thereafter the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner. Till representation(s) of petitioner(s) is/are decided, there shall be status quo as it exists today so far as transfer of present petitioner(s) is/are concerned. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil