APHC010424822019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 20428 OF 2019 Between: P B V Raju, S/o. Late Ganesh Varma, Aged about 63 years, R/o. Tagarampudi Village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur /" District, A.P. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District at Visakhapatnam. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The District Panchayat Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 5. The District Medical and Health Officer, Visakhapatnam, ^ Visakhapatnam District. 6. Pusapati Nrsimha Raju, S/o. Late Narasa Raju, R/o. Tagarampudi ^' Village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 7. Pusapati Appala Nrsimha Raju, S/o. Late Narasa Raju, R/o. Tagarampudi Village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more specifically nature of a writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent herein in directing the 5th respondent to handover Primary Health Centre Building, situated in Sy.No.153 of Tagarampudi Village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhaptnam District to respondents 6 and 7 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of one in the Article 300(A), 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and violation of Principles’ of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to restrain the respondents 4. and 7 to handover Community Health Centre Building, situated in Sy.No.153 of Tagarampudi Village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District to the 4th respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to direct the respondents 6 and 7 to stop illegal constructions situated at and the site of Community Health Centre Building, situated in Sy.No.153 of Tagarampudi Village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the writ petition, passed by the 3rd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3: GP FOR REVENUE / Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH AND^ FAMILY WELFARE The Court made the following order: ^APHC010424822019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 20428/2019 Between: 1.P B V RAJU, S/0. LATE GANESH YARMA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/0. TAGARAMPUDI VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ANAKAPALLE MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM. \ 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5.THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6.PUSAPATI NRSIMHA RAJU, S/0. LATE NARASA RAJU VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. R/0. TAGARAMPUDI ANAKAPALLE MANDAL 7.PUSAPATI APPALA NRSIMHA RAJU, S/0. LATE NARASA RAJU RIO. tagarampudi VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. VILLAGE, ANAKAPALLE MANCfAL, ■■■RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1-GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH 3.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ The Court made the following: ORAL ORDFR- FW(AP) rural DEV (AP) Sri K. Sai Rama Murthy, learned that this case has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ infructuous. No order Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed I Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits 2. Petition is disposed of as having become as to costs. 3. in terms of this order. Sd/- J SAROJA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ^ ^ Murthy Advocate [OPUC] Andhra Pradesh “-elopmen, Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies [OUT] ^ High Court of . High Court of GSC HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025 ORDER WP 20428/2019 s:> 0 AUG 2025 ov '•'S£S£4I£^^ DISPOSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS