Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29642 (ALL)

MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/8028/2025 · 2025-03-19

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40119 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8028 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Achal Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Petitioner is a complainant. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner (Complainant) to direct the Respondents to conclude the enquiry within stipulated period. 2. It is argued that in this regard representation has already been made by him before the Respondent No. 2 on 24.12.2024 and thereafter on 1/2.01.2025 but till date no decision has been taken. 3. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner to dismiss the present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Swati Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad