Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37195 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8870 of 2025 Applicant :- Arvind Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Heard Sri Satendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Santosh Pandey, learned Brief Holder for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 344 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 103(1) of B.N.S., Police Station Karhal, District Mainpuri, during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been made accused in the present matter along with several others including co-accused Saurabh and after considering the entire facts in detail, co-accused Saurabh has already been released on bail by this Court and his bail order has been annexed at page 80 of the paper book and on facts, case of the applicant is at part with him. 4. He next submits, however, apart from the present case, applicant is having criminal history of one another case but his criminal history has been explained in bail application and that case relates to minor offences. 5. He further submits that in the present matter, applicant is in jail since 30.11.2024. 6. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 8. Considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and that the fact that similarly placed co-accused Saurabh has already been released on bail by this Court with a detailed order and criminal history of solitary case of the applicant has been explained in the instant bail order and in the present matter he is in jail since 30.11.2024, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant - Arvind be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 11. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 12. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 Mini Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad