CRM-M-11410-2025 (O&M) 1 245 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11410-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2025 NARENDER ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Gurasis Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ritesh Tomar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harkesh Kumar, AAG Haryana. Mr. Dev Ahalawat, Advocate for respondent No. 2. *** Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.67 dated 03.02.2020 under Sections 323/506 of IPC registered at Police Station Sector 58, District Faridabad (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 23.04.2024 (Annexure P-2). 2. The following order was passed on 01.03.2025: “This petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seek- ing quashing of FIR No.67 dated 03.02.2020 under Sections 323/506 of IPC registered at Police Station Sector 58, District Faridabad (An- nexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 23.04.2024 (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Dev Ahlawat, Advocate accepts notice for re- spondent No.2 and files his vakalatnama, which is taken on record. He admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a petition filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act jointly by the peti- AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.04.01 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-11410-2025 (O&M) 2 tioner and the complainant/respondent No.2 is fixed for further con- sideration before the trial Court on 16.03.2025. As such, a request has been made for recording of the statements of the parties in terms of compromise on 16.03.2025. Allowed as prayed for. Adjourned to 28.03.2025. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear be- fore the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 16.03.2025 or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get re- corded their statements regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to in- timate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466 and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaush- alya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kul- winder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition is allowed and FIR No.67 dated 03.02.2020 under Sections 323/506 of IPC re- gistered at Police Station Sector 58, District Faridabad (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, qua the petitioner. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 28.03.2025 Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.04.01 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document