Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29627 (RAJ)

ASHA D/O SHRI NIRANJAN LAL W/O SHRI ANIL YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13766/2025 · 2025-09-11

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36833] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13766/2025 Asha D/o Shri Niranjan Lal W/o Shri Anil Yadav, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Nasarpur, Post Hamindpur, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. District Collector Kotputli- Behror, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. 4. S.d.o. Behror, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. 5. Tehsildar Behror, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. V. D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has akin factual matrix and legal issues as that of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8203/2025 titled as Sneh Lata Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. In light of the same, it is further submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to file an application before the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate, who will carry out the necessary enquiry and if the petitioner is found entitled for EWS certificate, the requisite formalities may be completed by offline/online mode, within a period of one month. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent, Mr. V.D. Gathala is unable to refute the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:36833] (2 of 2) [CW-13766/2025] 3. Having heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the order dated 07.07.2025 passed in Sneh Lata (supra), this Court has noted that the issue at hand is adjudicated in the above cited. Therefore, in light of the same, the petition is disposed of. The relevant extract of the order dated 07.07.2025 is reproduced herein below: “In view of above, this writ petition is also disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Sunita Kumari (supra). The petitioner is directed to make an application before the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate, who shall carry out the necessary enquiry as required under the law and if petitioner is found entitled for EWS certificate, same may be issued through offline/online mode within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the application. The Competent Authority is required to look into the entitlement of the candidate for the purpose of issuing certificate in EWS category and this certificate is not in relation to any caste or category. This Court also makes it clear that the observations of this Court in respect of grant of EWS certificate, will not have any bearing on entitlement of the petitioner to get benefit except that issuance of certificate will be in pursuance of circular issued by the State Government.” 4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /28