Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29626 (KAR)

MUNEER AHMED v. THE RECOVERY OFFICER

WP/37744/2017 · 2025-01-13

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1200 WP No. 37744 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 37744 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MUNEER AHMED S/O NAZEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 32 YEAR, R/O NO.8/137, B.B.ROAD, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.DEVI PRASAD SHETTY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, ASSISTANT REGISTER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (RULE-441), OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ALIASKER ROAD, BENGALURU-01. 2. SHREE SEETHARM MANDIRAM SOUHARDHA CO-OPERATIVE LTD., NO.1067, PATTABHIRAMA SHASTRI ROAD, ULSOORPET, BENGALURU-560 002. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 3. GIRISH S/O MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O 2238, 3RD MAIN ROAD, BYRAPPA BLOCK, THYAGARAJNAGAR BENGALURU-560 019. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1; SRI. DIVYA.K., ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3-SERVED) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1200 WP No. 37744 of 2017 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.01.2025, on that day, though matter called twice, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 13.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51