HP D.EL.Ed. COLLEGES WELFARE ASSOCIATION v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/17994/2025 · 2025-11-20
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29625 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29625 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:39235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.17994 of 2025 Decided on: 20.11.2025 Himachal Pradesh D.EI.Ed. Colleges Welfare Association
… Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner : Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Chander Shekhar Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Chander Shekhar Thakur, learned Counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1,2 and 3, respectively.
2. The limited prayer of the petitioner is that a representation that has been made by them to respondent-State with regard to further initiating the process to fill up the left over seats be decided within some reasonable time by granting requisite 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:39235 relaxation.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served in case this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to take a call on the representation of the petitioner within some reasonable time. Without making any observation on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with the direction that let the representation filed by the petitioner be decided within a period of two weeks from today. It is again clarified that and observed that this Court is not making any observation with regard to the merits of the petition and the call that shall be taken by the Authority concerned on the representation shall be as per its own wisdom and past practices. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge November 20, 2025 (Rishi)