Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29617 (JHR)

ARJUN TURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE DIRECTOR-CUM-INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE

WPC/6827/2024 · 2025-02-06

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6827 of 2024 Arjun Turi ….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Director-cum-Inspector General of Police, Ranchi 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Ranchi 3. The Sr. Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 4. The President, Jharkhand Police Men’s Association, Jharkhand, Ranchi 5. The Secretary General, Jharkhand Police Men’s Association, Jharkhand, Ranchi 6. The Chief Election Officer-cum-President, Police Men’s Association, Centre P.T.C, Hazaribagh ….. Respondents ----- CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak For the State: Mr. Amitesh Kumar Geasen, A.C to A.A.G-IA ----- 02/06.02.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the concerned respondents to cancel the election of Police Men’s Association at Jamshedpur Centre held on 08.09.2024, as according to the petitioner, the Observer deputed in the said election did not conduct the same fairly. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has represented the respondent No.3 raising the issue of irregularities committed in the said election, however, the same has not been responded by the said respondent, which has compelled him to prefer the present writ petition. 3. Mr. Amitesh Kumar Geasen, learned A.C to A.A.G-IA appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, submits that if the petitioner prefers a fresh representation on the present issue before the respondent No.3, an appropriate decision/step will be taken by the said respondent in accordance with law within a time frame. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of the prayer made in the present writ petition, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to prefer a fresh representation on the present issue before the respondent No.3. On receipt of the said representation, the respondent No.3, after getting an enquiry conducted and on providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the other concerned persons, shall take an appropriate decision/step in accordance with law within six weeks from the date of filing of the said representation. 5. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty and direction. Satish/- (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)