IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19436 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2024 Thana- Sonki District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Amresh Yadav @ Amresh Kumar S/o- Devendra Yadav Resident of Village- Basudevpur Ps- Sonki Dist-Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baidyanath Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 23-04-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 3(5) of the BNS. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 20.10.2024 at 5.00 A.M. when he went to attend call of nature outside the village, when all the accused persons including the petitioner intercepted him with lathi, danda and sharp weapon and assaulted him. Further, petitioner assaulted on the head of the informant by farsha causing injury, thereafter Vijay assaulted with an iron rod on the hand of the informant causing injury and Hariom and Sandeep assaulted by lathi causing injury on back and stomach. 4. The learned counsel submits that petitioner has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19436 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2 falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that though petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant by farsha but then the injury is opined to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance, which belies the allegation of assault by farsha, a sharp edged weapon, as alleged in the F.I.R. It is also submitted that on account of dispute an altercation had taken place in which both side assaulted each other but then the petitioner never assaulted by farsha. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sonki P.S. Case No.91/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T