1 D/L 29 20.06.2025 Rohit ct.no.25 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CO 1915 of 2023 With CAN 1 of 2024 Badkulla Anami Club & Ors. Versus Sri Goutam Roy & Anr. Mr. Ashoke Kumar Banerjee, Sr. Adv Mr. Amal Krishna Saha …for the Petitioners Mr. Balailal Sahoo Mr. Surojit Samanta Ms. Sohini Samanta …for the O.P The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11th of April, 2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nadia in Title Suit No. 40 of 1989. Vide impugned order the learned Trial Judge declined the adjournment plea being moved by the petitioner/defendant no.1. At the outset the learned counsels have submitted that there seems to be some error in the impugned order, as the adjournment was sought on the ground of illness of the lawyer for the defendant, whereas the learned Trial Court Judge took it as the illness of the defendant. There seems to be some inadvertent error. However, without going into the 2 further merits the order dated 11th April, 2023 is set aside. The learned Trial Court shall decide the application afresh for appointment of the learned Advocate Commissioner after giving both the parties an opportunity of being heard. However, such application shall be decided on or before 31st of July, 2025. The learned Trial Court shall not grant any unnecessary adjournment to the petitioner/defendant no.1. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)