HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 924/2025 Shubha Devi ..... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. Vinod Kotwal, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 21.04.2025 After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to approach the respondents by way of filing a representation within one week and prays that the said representation be disposed of expeditiously. In light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of one week from today before respondent no. 2, who shall accord consideration to the same strictly under rules and as per law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order of consideration, which is likely to be passed be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 21.04.2025 Mihul Sr. No. 41 Mihul Singh 2025.04.21 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document