Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29607 (CHH)

BHUPENDRA CHANDRAKAR v. NIRMAL CHANDRAKAR

WP227/492/2021 · 2025-06-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25781 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 492 of 2021 • Bhupendra Chandrakar S/o Shri Girdharilal Chandrakar Aged About 43 Years R/o Charra Road, Sarojni Chowk, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Nirmal Chandrakar S/o Shri Kashiram Chandrakar Aged About 51 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 2 - Manish Sahu S/o Shri Ravishankar Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Kailash Shukla S/o Shri Gourishankar Shukla Aged About 48 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Chovaram Sahu S/o Shri Mansharam Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Khilendra Chandrakar S/o Shri Radheshyam Chandrakar Aged About 44 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Smt. Suman Chandrakar W/o Shri Omprakash Chandrakar Aged About 48 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Smt. Jyoti Magar W/o Shri Gopal Magar Aged About 38 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 8 - Smt. Anusuiya Sahu W/o Shri Yashwant Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Priyanka Colony, Kurud, Tahsil- Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 9 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 8 : Mr. Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 For Respondent No. 9 : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19/06/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. However, he would submit that direction may be issued to the learned trial court to expedite the proceedings of pending civil suit as the suit was filed on 15.03.2019. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Permission granted. 4. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the trial Court is directed to make endevour to conclude the proceedings of pending civil suit. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti