PRAKASH CHAND SON OF LATE LADA DEVI v. MANGAL CHAND ADOPTED SON OF SHRI HANUMANRAM
CW/14767/2024 · 2025-04-25
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29603 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29603 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17675] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14767/2024
1. Prakash Chand Son Of Late Lada Devi, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). 2. Mohan Lal S/o Late Lada Devi, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). 3. Bhagirath S/o Late Lada Devi, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). 4. Mukesh S/o Late Lada Devi, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). 5. Gopiram S/o Gullaram, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). 6. Sita Devi Daughter Of Late Lada Devi, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, At Present Ranjitpura, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. 7. Santosh Devi Daughter Of Late Lada Devi, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, At Present Ranjitpura, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. 8. Pinki Devi Daughter Of Late Lada Devi, Resident Of Village Mahroli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, At Present Bawdi, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Mangal Chand Adopted Son Of Shri Hanumanram, Resident Of Behind Garh, Tehsil Ringus, District Sikar. 2. Bhoomidhari Tehsildar, Tehsil Ringus, District Sikar. 3. Patwari, Patwar Halka Ringus, Tehsil Ringus, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Tamoliya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 25/04/2025 The present writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners against the order dated 22.07.2024 passed by the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial
[2025:RJ-JP:17675] (2 of 2) [CW-14767/2024] Magistrate, Ringus, Distt. Sikar in Civil Suit No.103/2023, whereby the application under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. was dismissed. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for both the parties stated that the present writ petition has been filed against the aforesaid order dated 22.07.2024 against which a review petition has already been filed in the learned Trial Court and the same is pending. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one, if occasion so arises. He further submits that a direction may also be issued to the learned Court below to dispose of the review petition within a period of one month. Prayer, as sought for, is allowed. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Learned Trial Court is directed to dispose of the aforesaid review petition within a period of one month from today in accordance with law. Office to send a copy of this order to the learned Trial Court via E-mail for further information and necessary compliance. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /70