APHC010423972018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Diresanapu Subba Reddy The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction the 2nd respondent in passing the orders on the stay petition filed along with revision petitioner which was filed challenging the proceedings No R.C.C /110/2016 dated 26 cancelled the authorization of the peti Village, Markapuram Mandal IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 19578/2018 ...PETITIONER AND f Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) following: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the “…to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction respondent in passing the orders on the stay petition filed along with revision petitioner which was filed challenging the proceedings No C /110/2016 dated 26.12.2017 of the 4th respondent where under cancelled the authorization of the petitioner, Shop No.6, Birudalanarava Markapuram Mandal, Prakasam District Andhra Pradesh [3311] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the “…to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction of respondent in passing the orders on the stay petition filed along with revision petitioner which was filed challenging the proceedings No. respondent where under Birudalanarava Prakasam District Andhra Pradesh 2 BSB, J W.P.No.19578 of 2018 without conducting an independent enquiry and the consequential order dt 26.05.2018 passed by the 3rd respondent without application of mind as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders…..” 2. No representation for the petitioner, inspite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J Date: 29.01.2025 GRL 3 BSB, J W.P.No.19578 of 2018 185 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI Writ Petition No.19578 of 2018 Date: 29.01.2025 GRL