Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2958 (RAJ)

NARENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI AJAY SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/580/2025 · 2025-02-04

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4746] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 580/2025 Narendra Singh S/o Shri Ajay Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o House No. 121A, Dhanka Basti, Kabristan Ke Pas, Police Station Railway Station, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present He Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Mahesh Sharma, Mr. Fateh Ram Meena, Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Ms. Neha Goyal, Mr. Anirudh Tyagi for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 04/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 362/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur City (East), District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1) of BNS and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that in the FIR, the name of the accused-petitioner is not mentioned. It is also contended that the main allegations of causing mischief at the house of the complainant Aruna Devi are [2025:RJ-JP:4746] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-580/2025] against the other co-accused and the recovery of fire arm was also effected at the instance of the other co-accused Achitya Singh. It is also contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2024, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned GA cum AAG as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that in order to take revenge from the complainant's grand-son, the co-accused in conspiracy with the accused-petitioner attacked at the house of the complainant and thereafter, opened fire, at the instance of the other co-accused Achitya Singh. The accused-petitioner is a member of the Syndicate operated by the other co-accused and they threatened the grand-son of the complainant, who had deposed against the co-accused in a criminal case pending before the concerned Court, therefore, considering the allegations levelled against the accused-petitioner, the bail application may be dismissed. 5. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 6. The factual report shows that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, the main allegations of causing mischief, opening fire and threatening the grand-son of the complainant are against the other co-accused namely, Kundan, Aachitya Singh, Akram @ Akki, Rakesh Saini @ Babu and Kuldeep Gehlot @ Kalu, therefore, considering the above facts, [2025:RJ-JP:4746] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-580/2025] without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Narendra Singh S/o Shri Ajay Singh, in connection with FIR No.362/2024, registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur City (East), District Jaipur City (East) shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/1