$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6413/2025 JASNEET SINGH BHASIN AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Piyush Wadhwa and Ms. Vriddhi Bhatt, Advocates along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State with SI Bharat Singh, PS: Uttam Nagar. Ms. Shivani Pawar and Mr. Mayank Tanwar, Advocates for R-2 and R-2 in person (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R % 10.09.2025 CRL.M.A. 27059/2025 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6413/2025 3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing No. 345/2023, registered at Police Station Mayapuri, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC'). 4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 12:16:02 5. All the petitioners are present before this Court and respondent no. 2 has appeared through video-conferencing, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned. 6. Brief facts of the case are that on 29.10.2023, due to some misunderstanding, a dispute occurred between the petitioners and the respondent no. 2 at Grand Dream Baikunt Hall, Mayapuri, Delhi, during a wedding function. Thereafter, upon the complaint by respondent no. 2, the present FIR came to be registered against the petitioners. It is stated that with intervention of the friends and respected members of the society, the parties have now amicably settled their dispute vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 18.07.2025. 7. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 8. In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 9. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 345/2023, registered at Police Station Mayapuri, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 308/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to petitioners depositing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each in the Advocates‟ Welfare Fund, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi and the compliance This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 12:16:02 report of the same be filed with the Registry of this Court, within a period of 07 days from date. 10. The present petition stands disposed of. 11. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/vc This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2025 at 12:16:02