APHC010424032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22181/2025 Between: MUPPALLA PHANINDRA KUMAR,, (WRONGLY SHOWN AS MUPPAVARAPU PHANIDRA KUMAR IN THE FIR), S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 45, R/O. FLAT NO. 502, SKYLINE PRIDE APARTMENTS, VIDYANAGAR, GANNAVARAM, ALLAPURAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521101. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DGP OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATAMATA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 5. THE BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC BANK, LABBIPET BRANCH, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th Respondent, SHO (Inspector of Police), Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada in proceeding to de- freeze the bank accounts of the Accused (HDFC Bank A/c.Nos. 50500056069331, 50200024128767 and 50200026543390) which were freezed by virtue of notice 2 U/s.91 Cr.P.C. (94 BNSS) dated 21-07-2025 in Crime No. 389 of 2025 of Patamata Police Station, as the same is contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, biased and without jurisdiction and consequently to direct the respondent police to maintain the freezing of the above bank accounts till completion of investigation/trial.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22181 of 2025 Dt.28.08.2025 Dinesh