Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29569 (AP)

KAKULAPATI VENKATA RAMANA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/21952/2025 · 2025-08-20

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010423102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 21952/2025 Between: 1. KAKULAPATI VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. SRI RAMULU, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, PASIVEDALA, KOWUR MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST., ERST WHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, ,REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. 2 THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, LEGAL AFFAIRS. LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTIONS, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, R B ICONIC BUILDING, M.G. ROAD, 0PP. INDIRA GANDHI MUNICIPAL STADIUM, PUNAMMATHOTA, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, A.P. 4. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Siva Rama Krishna Kolluru, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Law & Legislative Affairs. 2. The prayer sought in the present Writ Petition is as under: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring G.O.Rt.No.1295 dated 04.08.2025 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Principles of Natural justice and the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in Deepak Ananda Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors reported in (2023) 11 SCC 130 Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P. reported in 1991 (1) SCC 212 and Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently set aside the G.O.Rt.No.1295 dt. 04.08.2025 issued by the 1st respondent and direct the respondents to reinstate the Petitioner to the post of Addl. Public Prosecutor for Addl. Assistant Sessions Judge (FTC) Court, Kovvur, East Godavari District, till completion of his tenure i.e., till dt. 31.03.2027, and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 3. Having regard to the above prayer, this Court is of the view that the present case is squarely covered by the Common Order of this Court dated 18.08.2025 in W.P.Nos.21413 & 21494 of 2025. 4. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed in terms of the said Common Order dated 18.08.2025 in W.P.Nos.21413 & 21494 of 2025. No order as to costs. 5. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the Common Order dated 18.08.2025 in W.P.Nos.21413 & 21494 of 2025 along with this Order. 3 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:21.08.2025 DSV 4 147 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 21952/2025 21.08.2025 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 21952/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 01. 21.08.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is dismissed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6