Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29567 (JHR)

ABHAY KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6700/2018 · 2025-08-11

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:24593 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6700 of 2018 --------- 1. Abhay Kumar Pandey, Aged About 37 years, S/o Yamuna Prasad Pandey, R/o Birajpur, P. Ο. Birajpur, P. S. Barwada Dist Dhanbad (Jharkhand) PIN 828 113. 2. Laloo Yadaw, Aged About 28 years, S/o Madan Yadaw, R/o Nawadih, P. S. Pratappur, P.O.Jogiara Dist- Chatra (Jharkhand) PIN 825 404. 3. Sanjay Xaxa, Aged About 38 Years, S/o Harijhon Xaxa, R/o Vill Hami Pandri Toli, P. O. Hami, P. S. Mahuadanr, Dist Latehar (Jharkhand) - 822 119 4. Amardeep kumar Mehta, Aged About 35 Years S/o Suraj Narayan Mehta, R/o House No A/1- C. C. L Quarter, Near Pani Tanki, Vill K. B. Gate Colony, P. O. + P. S. Kuju, Dist Ramgarh, (Jharkhand) PIN 825316. 5. Lakhan Dew Bhagat Aged About 35 Years, S/o Jaigi Bhagat R/o Kharta, P. O Kharta P. S Kairo Dist Lohardaga (Jharkhand) PIN 835 302. 6. Anil Kumar Singh Aged About 36 Years, S/o Late Shivjee Singh, R/o Vill Jura, P. O. Khajuriya, P. S. Mufasil, Dist Bhojpur (Bihar) PIN 802 156. 7. Subodh Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 34 Years S/o Late Ram Brickh Jaiswal, R/o Vill Beetbangla, P. O. + P. S. Tatisilwai, Dist Ranchi (Jharkhand) PIN 835103. 8. Shailesh Kumar Mishra, Aged About 38 Years S/o Janardan Mishra, R/o Vill Amidha, P. O. Semoura P. S. Kandi, Dist Garhwa (Jharkhand). 9. Muneshwar Ram Aged About 35 Years S/o Late Khaita Ram R/o B/1945, Sector 2, HEC Colony, P. O. Jagarnathpur, P. S. Dhurwa, Ranchi Jharkhand PIN 834 004. 10. Dilip Kumar Yadav Aged About 36 Years S/o Sitaram Yadav, R/o P. O. Patam, P. S. Nayaram Nagar, Paniyarachak, Dist Mungair (Bihar) PIN 811 214. 11. Ganga Ram Purty aged about 35 years W/o Shanti Sundi, R/o 130 Adityapur Basti, Near ESI dispensary, P.O.+P.S. Adityapur, Dist.-Searikela Kharsawan (Jharkhand) PIN 831013. ....Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Through its Secretary, Kali Nagar, Chai Began, P.O.+P.S. Namkum, District- 2025:JHHC:24593 2 Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Lalit Kr. Singh, Adv. For the Resp.-State : Mr. Awanish Shekhar, A.C.to AAG-I For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Advocates --------- 06/11.08.2025 1. By way of present writ application petitioners have prayed for direction upon the respondents to consider their cases for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector of Police pursuant to Advt. No. 09/2017 advertised by Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, in the light of order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 297 of 2018 and its analogous appeal and give similar benefits to the petitioners as has been given to Sachit Kumar Singh, Narendra Singh and Raj Kishore Tiwari since they are similarly situated candidates. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach concerned respondent, so that their grievances raised in the writ application can be redressed. 3. Since counter-affidavit has not been filed, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioners may be directed to file individual fresh representations before the concerned respondent, who shall decide the case in accordance with law. 4. Having heard the fair submissions of learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respective petitioners to file fresh representations before the concerned respondent. The 2025:JHHC:24593 3 moment the concerned respondent will receive any such representation(s), he shall take decision in accordance with law and applicable Rules and Regulations within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation(s). 5. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. Pending I.A. if any also stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amardeep/-