Arugolanu Visweswara Rao v. The State Andhra Pradesh,
WP/22282/2025 · 2025-09-03
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29559 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29559 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010423332025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 22282/2025 Between:
1. ARUGOLANU VISWESWARA RAO, S/O. ARUGOLANU PASHALU, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.15-04-14, BAPUJI NAGAR, KOVVURU VILLAGE, KOVVURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT -534 350. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , KOVVURU DIVISION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVARAPALLI MANDALAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in showing the petitioner land in Red Mark in the revenue records without issuing any notice or without following process of law, straight away showing the land in Red Mark of the petitioner property situated in Sy.No. 398-1 to an extent of Ac.6.00 cts situated at Yadavolu Village, Devarapally Mandalam, West Godavari District is highly illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and against to the Rule 9(1) (c) (ii) of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Rules 1989 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to remove / delete the red mark from the revenue records in connection with the petitioner property and to pass
2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to remove / delete the red mark from the revenue records in connection with the petitioner property situated in Sy No. 398-1 to an extent of Ac.6.00 cts situated at Yadavolu Village, Devarapally Mandalam, West Godavari District pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RIZWAN ALI SHAIK
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.22282 of 2025 ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and to grant liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 04.09.2025 SPP
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
W.P.No. 22282 OF 2025
Date: 04.09.2025
SPP