Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29557 (JHR)

MD NAJMUL HODA v. SK MAJIBUR REHMAN

C.R./78/2018 · 2025-06-20

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:16330 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No.78 of 2018 Md. Najmul Hoda, aged about 79 years, son of Late Rehmanjan Bibi, resident of village-Khjuria, P.O.-Kurwa (Asansol), P.S. Dumka (T) Sub- Division, District-Dumka. … Petitioner Versus 1. S.K. Mujibur Rehman, son of Sk. Imam Uddin, at present residence of village-Paikpara, Nalhati, P.O. + P.S.- Nalhati, District- Birbhum (West Bengal) and permanent R/o Khijuria, P.O.- Kurwa (Asansol), P.S. Dumka (T) Sub-Division & District-Dumka. 2. Atiyur Rehman, wife of Md. Shamsul, resident of village-Paikpara, Nalhati, P.O. Nalhati, Sub-Division & District- Birbhum (West Bengal) … Opposite Parties Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : None For the Opp. Party : Order No.17/Dated- 20.06.2025 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Pursuant to the order dated 28.04.2025, the fresh notices were issued for the appearance of the opposite parties and two weeks’ time was granted to the petitioner to file requisites etc., but no compliance has been done by the petitioner. 3. It also appears that vide order dated 28.04.2025, petitioner was directed to file the substitution application for the deceased opposite party nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 22 and 45., but the same has also not been done. 4. Since the petitioner is also not taking any steps in this case this, hence Civil Revision No. 78 of 2018 is dismissed for default. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/-