APHC010423352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 21571/2025 Between: A.S.V.RAMANA, S/O.LATE SIMHACHALAM AGED 52 YEARS, D.5-86, MANGALAPALEM, GAJUWAKA MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDAGANTYADA POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. KATTA VENKATA APPALA SHANKARA RAO, , S/O. KATTA APPALASWAMY, FLAT NO.503, BHUPATI RESIDENCY, ROAD NO.6, TIRUMALANAGAR, VADLAPUDI, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. MATURI JAYASWARARAO, S/O. MATURI APPARAO DOOR NO.31- 30-93/1, VADLAPUDI, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM . ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S NAGENDRA VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2,3, not adhering to the representations dated 26.5.2025, 8.5.2025, 19.7.2025 of the petitioner and not taking action against the 2 respondents 4,5, as respondent 5 had cheated the petitioner by the influence of respondent 4, and executed sale agreement in favour of the petitioner and respondent 4, towards the property of house site situated at Pedagantyada, Gajuwaka, in Sy. 27, Plot no.12223B, 1224B,1225B for an extent of 428 Sq. yds which does not belongs to the respondent 5, showing fake documents in the name of the respondent 5, by receiving sale consideration advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- as highly arbitrary, illegal, null and void and against the principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents authorities 2,3 to register FIR against the respondents 4, 5.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, the matter is purely civil in nature and the Police never interfere with the civil issues unless there is a direction from the Court. 3. Sri K.S.Nagendra Vara Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:21.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21571 of 2025 Dt.21.08.2025 Dinesh