Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29555 (KAR)

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF v. DR.MAHESH K MENON

CRL.A/1555/2022 · 2025-02-04

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4908 CRL.A No. 1555 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1555 OF 2022 BETWEEN: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. MAGNUM INTERGRAFIKS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN LIQN.) ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA “CORPORATE BHAVAN”, No. 26-27, 12TH FLOOR RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. …APPELLANT (BY SRI MURALI N, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND: DR. MAHESH K MENON INSTITUTE OF INDIAN THERAPIES ANNA MANADA P.O., THRISSUR (DH) KERALA – 680 741. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF Cr.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 31.03.2021 PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MANGALURU D.K., IN C.C.No.411/2014 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO CONVICT THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT FOR AN OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I ACT AND ETC., THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4908 CRL.A No. 1555 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation on appellant's side. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant was also absent on 04.12.2024. This Court on 04.12.2024 passed the following order:- "Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation. The appeal is of the year 2022 and it is listed for 3rd time for compliance of office objection. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, one week time is granted to comply with the office objection. List this matter after one week." 3. Today the appeal is listed for compliance of office objections for the fourth time. There is no reason to adjourn the matter. It appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4908 CRL.A No. 1555 of 2022 4. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 CT:SM