IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.17842 of 2024 Decided on: 17.11.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Bhama Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors . …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. T.R. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner challenges office order dated 26.03.2025, whereby respondents have rejected her prayer qua applicability of Sunder Singh Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.2, Balo Devi & others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others3 and as a consequence, pension has been denied to the petitioner 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 Civil Appeal No.6309 of 2017, decided on 08.03.2018 3 Civil Appeal No.4792 of 2022, decided on 18.07.2022 - 2 - under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petition suffers from defects in the pleadings as also in the relief clause. Proper documents in support of petitioner’s case have also not been appended. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law after incorporating necessary pleadings and supporting documents. 3. Granting such permission, present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge November 17, 2025 R.Atal