APHC010423252013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 36700/2013 Between: 1. M. SRINIVASULU, S/O KONDAIAH CHOWDARY, OCC: BUSINESS R/O 77/16, INDUSTRIAL ESTATES, KURNOOL. 2. A. PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O NAGESWARA RAO,, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O MANGAMURU DONKA, ONGOLE 3. V. DHANAVENDAR RAO, S/O V. LOKA RAJU,, OCC: BUSINESS, RIO. 11.NO.77/98, KOLLUR, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. APSRTC, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & MANGAING DIRECTOR, BUS BHAVAN, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APSRTC, NELLORE REGION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, ONGOLE 5. THE DY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, APSRTC, ONGOLE 6. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC ONGOLE, - ...RESPONDENT(S): SRS,J W.P.No.36700 of 2013 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly Writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to insist on payment of the license fee in respect of the stalls Nos. 28, 50, 70 & 75 situated at Ongole Bus station which have been allotted to petitioners pursuant to the respective deeds of license entered into between petitioners and the 1st respondent, for the months September & October by declaring the action of the respondents in insisting for payment of the license fees without considering the representation of the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and without jurisdiction IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 45629 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 6 not to insist on payment of the license fees in respect of the stall operated by the petitioners bearing Stall No.28, 50, 70 & 75 in Ongole bus station during the agitation period by extending the license period to compensate loss of three months which is agitation period pending disposal of the Writ Petition IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 201218 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 2070 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders dated 16.12.2013 passed in W.P.M.P. No. 45629 of 2013 in WP No. 36700 of 2013, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. I MAAMU VANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARUN KUMAR LATHKER(SC FOR APSRTC) 2. GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following order: SRS,J W.P.No.36700 of 2013 Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 07.07.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 09.07.2025 IKN SRS,J W.P.No.36700 of 2013 370 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 36700 of 2013 Date: 09.07.2025 IKN