Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29554 (RAJ)

MANOHARI DEVI WIFE OF LATE LAXMAN SINGH JI ( EX- SOLDIER) v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5907/2024 · 2025-03-07

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10530] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5907/2024 1. Manohari Devi Wife of Late Laxman Singh Ji (Ex- Soldier), Aged About 80 Years, R/o Ward No. 25, Cinema Scope Ke Samne, Ranisati Road Under Police Station Kotwali, Sikar (Raj). (Since Deceased) Through Her Legal Heir- 2. Kishan Singh Son of Late Manohari Devi, Son Of Late Laxman Singh Ji (Ex-Soldier), R/o Ward No. 25, Cinema Scope Ke Samne, Ranisati Road Under Police Station Kotwali, Sikar (Raj). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sunita Saini, Advocate & Dr. Dashrath Singh Shekhawat, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 07/03/2025 : Instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred on behalf of complainant-petitioner seeking fair & impartial investigation in the impugned impugned F.I.R. No.515/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sikar for offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 427 & 120-B of I.P.C. In compliance of the order dt.17.02.2025 passed by this Court, learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the latest factual report, which is taken on record. As per factual report, the Investigating Officer has submitted a Final Report in negative form before ld. Trial Court. Heard. Perused. [2025:RJ-JP:10530] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5907/2024] Since the Investigating Officer has submitted a Final Report in negative form before the ld. Trial Court & no controversy is left in the matter for adjudication, the present petition has become infructuous and the same deserves to be dismissed as such. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. However, it is made clear that the petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to alternative lawful remedy available to him in accordance with the provisions of law before the ld. Trial Court. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J ASHOK-saurabh