;/ « IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3709 OF 2019 Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C., is filed against the Order made in E.A.No.278 of 2019 in E.P.No.60 of 2017 in O.S.No.136 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada 29-10-2019. Dated Between: 1. Baggu Seethapati Rao, S/o Sri Suryanarayana, Hindu, Age: 65 Years, Occ; Retd. Employee, R/o D.No. 70-5/1-57, Thota Subbarao Nagar, Ramanaiah Peta, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 2. Baggu Subramanyeswari, W/o Sri Seethapati Rao, Hindu, Age: 55 Years, Occ: House Wife, R/o D.No. 70-5/1-57, Thota Subbarao Nagar, Ramanaiah Peta, Kakinada, E.G.Dist ...Petitioners/Petitioners/ J.Drs/Defendants AND Guthuia Seshagiri Rao, S/o. Sri Rama Rao, R/o D.No. 70-5-28, Ramanaiah Peta, Kakinada - 533 005, E.G.Dist. ...Respondent/ Respondent/D.Hr/Plaintiff lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.60 of 2017 in O.S No. 136 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, pending disposal of the present CRP. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. N Siva Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri A Rajendra Babu The Court made the following: APHC010422782019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3365] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3709/2019 Between: Baggu Seethapati Rao and Others ...PETITIONER{S) AND ...RESPONDENT Guthula Seshagiri Rao Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent; 1.ARAJENDRABABU The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3709 of 2019 ORDER: Heard learned counsel on both sides. 2. The submissions made at the bar and the record would indicate that the interim orders for deposit and the stay that was granted conditionally remained unfulfilled, as deposits, as directed were not made. 3. In such circumstances, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stands closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEGTION OFFICER To. 1. The II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division): Kakinada, East Godavari District, (with records if any) One CC to Sri N Siva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri A Rajendra Babu, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED:18/03/2025 ORDER CRP.No.3709 of 2019 ^ 0 * APR J025 I ^ . Cuffent Safitlon DISMISSING THE C.R.P. WITHOUT COSTS