APHC010422682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21790/2025 Between: 1. KODURI LUSAMMA, A W/O. K. KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. PAKALA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523101. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA-GUNTUR HIGHWAY MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SINGARAYAKONDA POLICE STATION SINGARAYAKONDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. VAYALA ANANDHA RAO, S/O. V. RAMA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. PAKALA VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523101 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or a direction or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in not taking any action against the unofficial respondent No. 5 upon the complaints made by the Petitioner on dated 07.07.2025 and 05.08.2025 and in not registering the crime against the unofficial respondnet No. 5 herein as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, and to consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to register the crime against the unofficial respondent No. 5, and to pass su IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to take action against the unofficial respondent No. 5 upon the complaints made by the Petitioner on dated 07.07.2025 and 05.08.2025, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BODDULURI ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order or a direction or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in not taking any action against the unofficial respondent No. 5 upon the complaints made by the Petitioner on dated 07.07.2025 and 05.08.2025 and in not registering the crime against the unofficial respondnet No. 5 herein as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, and to consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to register the crime against the unofficial respondent No. 5, and to pass....…” 2. Heard Sri B.Anjaneyulu, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that police are not taking any action against the complaints dated 07.07.2025 and 05.08.2025. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the matter is purely civil in nature that is why the police have not taken any action against the complaints of the petitioner. 5. Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025 MH HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 32 W.P.No.21790 of 2025 Dated: 03.09.2025 MH