IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19943 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Surjinder Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Piyush Dhanotia, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused material adduced on record vis-à-vis reasoning assigned in the impugned order dated 15.12.2025, whereby request made by the petitioner to post him at a convenient station on the ground of his being nearing retirement has been rejected, this Court sees no reason to interfere in the same and as such, same is upheld. 2. In view of the above, the present petition fails and is accordingly dismissed alongwith pending applications, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 17,2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?