APHC010422812019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20345/2019 Between: G ASHOK, S/O LAZAR, AGED 26 YEARS, UNEMPLOYEE, R/O.KOPPERAPALEM VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, PR AND RD, SECRETERIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER PRANDRD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, 5. THE MANDALA PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HANUMANTHA RAO VELLALACHERVU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not admitting the petitioner in to services as per proceedings 2 No.933/2018(Pts)A4, dated 06-06-2019 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the 5th Respondent to admit the Petitioner into services as per the proceedings No.933/2018(Pts)A4, dated 06.06.2019.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I would submit that, in the light of the interim order dated 17.02.2020 passed by this Court, the Respondent Authorities permitted the Petitioner to report to the duty on 19.06.2020. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed the typed letter of the Petitioner, on record, to show that, in pursuance of the same, the Petitioner wants to withdraw the petition. 4. In the absence of the Petitioner or his counsel, this Court cannot record the withdrawal of the writ petition. However, it appears that the Respondent Authorities have complied with the interim order passed by this Court. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.04.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20345 of 2019 Dt.17.04.2025 Dinesh