Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29522 (KAR)

SMT M G PREMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18156/2025 · 2025-06-25

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22354 WP No. 18156 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18156 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. M.G. PREMA W/O LATE R.B. SHANKARA LINGAPPA AGED 65 YEARS R/O MACHENAHALLI TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 215 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRA CHOODA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE TAHASILDAR GUBBI TALUK, GUBBI-572 216 TUMAKURU DISTRICT 3. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, GUBBI TALUK, GUBBI-572 216 TUMAKURU DISTRICT Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22354 WP No. 18156 of 2025 4. ADDITIONAL LAND DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, GUBBI TALUK GUBBI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT -572 216. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 AND 3 TO ISSUE PHODI AND DURASTHI, 11E SKETCH IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY. NO.144/2A1 AND SY. NO. 144/2B, SITUATED AT KADABA VILLAGE, KADABA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent-authorities to issue the Phodi, Durasti, and 11E sketch in respect of the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22354 WP No. 18156 of 2025 subject land, pursuant to the online applications submitted by the petitioner, copies of which are produced at Annexures–J and K. It is contended that despite the said applications, the respondent- authorities have not taken any action or passed any orders on the same. 4. In that view of the matter, the respondent- authorities are directed to considered the online application produced at Annexure-J and K at the earliest. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19