Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29520 (JHR)

BINAY PRAKASH AKHOURI v. MR. AJIT KUMAR SINHA, THE VICE CHANCELLOR, RANCHI UNIVERSITY

Cont.(Cvl)/1133/2024 · 2025-07-18

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:19664 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1133 of 2024 --------- Binay Prakash Akhouri, son of Sri A.B.B. Lall, resident of Mohalla- Aryapuri, Ratu Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi. ……. Petitioner Versus 1. Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Vice Chancellor, Ranchi University, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 2. Mr. Vinod Narayan, Registrar, Ranchi University, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 3. The State of Jharkhand. 4. Mr. Ramniwas Yadav, Director, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department (now Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development Department), Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. 5. Mr. Rahul Kumar Purwar, Secretary, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department (now Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development Department), Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.o. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. ……. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, AC to GA-III Dr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Sharon Toppo, Advocate Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate ---- 04/18.07.2025 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the opposite parties have passed reasoned order in compliance of the Court’s order and as such, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the contempt application with a liberty to challenge the reasoned order. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite parties do not have any serious objection. 3. Having regard to the fair submissions of the parties, the instant contempt application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Kunal