IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4620-2001 (O &M) Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 Dharambir ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Ms. Simran Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.3. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to fix his salary in revised pay scale. 2. The petitioner is claiming that he should be granted benefit of 5th Pay Commission. The respondent in its reply had submitted that case of employees of respondent-Federation is under consideration. There is nothing on record with respect to decision of State Government or the Federation itself to grant benefit of 5th Pay Commission. The said benefit cannot be granted to a particular employee because benefit of Pay Commission is extended to all the employees. 3. There is no representation of the petitioner. It appears that with the efflux of time, he has lost his interest in pursuing instant petition. 4. Dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application within 3 months from today, if cause survives. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 10.07.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.11 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document