1 2025:CGHC:25973 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1901 of 2016 1 - Smt. Saroj Bajpai W/o. Shri Shailendra Bajpai Aged About 45 Years Working As U D T, Govt. Girls Middle School, Mangla, R/o 404- A, Bhatia Residency, Mangla Road, Bilaspur 495001 Dist. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Mantralaya, Naya Raipur 492002 Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Mungeli Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 495001, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Education Officer, D E O Office, Bilaspur 495001. Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Block Education Officer, Bilha Block, Bilha 495220 District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Devki Jaiswal W/o Shri Ajay Jaiswal Aged About 38 Years Working As Shiksha Karmi At Govt. Girls Middle School, Mangla, Bilaspur 495001 Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. F. S. Khare, Advocate For respective Respondent(s) : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, G. A. & Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput) 2 Order on Board 19/06/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief:- 10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court be pleased to accept the writ petition and pleased to decide the petitioner’s grievance. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court be pleased to set aside the transfer and posting order of respondent No.5 Smt. Devki Jaiswal from Govt. Middle School Beltara to Govt. Girls Middle School, Mangla i.e. order dated 16.07.2014 (Annexure P-7) in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that challenge in this writ petition is to the transfer order of respondent No.5 by which the respondent No.5 was transferred in the school of the petitioner as a result of which the petitioner was treated as surplus and was subsequently transferred. Therefore, the impugned transfer order cannot sustain in the eyes of law. 3. Learned counsel for the State supports the transfer order. 4. Mr. Sharma submits that in compliance of transfer order, the respondent No. 5 has already joined the place of posting and for 10 years, she is continuously working in the transfer place. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In light of above, this Court is not inclined to disturb respondent No.5 by canceling her transfer order. Even otherwise the petitioner is not affected by the transfer order as such the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Parul PARUL MITTAL Digitally signed by PARUL MITTAL Date: 2025.06.23 10:25:30 +0530