RAM BILASH YADAV ALIAS RAM VILASH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./206/2025 · 2025-07-18
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29516 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29516 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:19797 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.206 of 2025
------ Ram Bilash Yadav @ Ram Vilash Yadav, age-41 years, S/o-Rajbir Singh, R/o-IRB-2, Musabani, P.O. + P.S.-Musabani, Dist.-East Singhbhum.
… Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Victim
… Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-18-07-2025
Heard the parties.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3068 of 2021 to its original file; which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory
order dated 14.06.2024.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.3068 of 2021 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 14.06.2024 for filing requisites for service of notice upon the opposite party no.2 peremptorily within two weeks. It is next submitted that the counsel of the petitioner directed his clerk to file requisites but due to his sudden illness, the petitioner could not file the said requisites within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3068 of 2021 for non-compliance of the order dated 14.06.2024. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said order dated 14.06.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3068 of 2021 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3068 of 2021 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, Cr.M.P. No.3068 of 2021 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3068 of 2021 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/