Supuri lakshmi Aruna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/2586/2022 · 2025-09-11
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2951 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2951 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010010112022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2586/2022 Between:
1. SUPURI LAKSHMI ARUNA, , W/O. PRASAD AGE- ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-316, KOTHAPETA, CHURCH BAZAR, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
2. THE MANGALAGIRI AND TADEPALLI MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI AND TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:-
All these Writ Petitions are filed by the petitioners, aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in allotting the plots constructed under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) scheme.
2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that a counter is filed and registered Sale Deeds were executed in favour of the petitioners and possession has also handed over to the petitioners. As such, the grievance of the petitioners has been adequately addressed by the respondent authorities.
3. Accordingly, all the Writ Petitions are closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR