MITHILESH TYAGI W/O LATE SHRI PV SHARMA v. ARUNA SHARMA W/O LATE SHRI PREM VALLABH SHARMA
CW/14552/2024 · 2025-01-16
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2128] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14552/2024 Mithilesh Tyagi W/o Late Shri Pv Sharma, R/o 24, Suraj Nagar East, Civil Lines, Jaipur. ----Intervenor/Petitioner/Objector Versus
1. Aruna Sharma W/o Late Shri Prem Vallabh Sharma, Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Greater Kailash Colony, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
2. Ashish Sharma S/o Late Shri Prem Vallabh Sharma, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Greater Kailash Colony, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Arun Sharma W/o Late Shri Prem Vallabh Sharma, Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Greater Kailash Colony, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
3. Anushri Sharma D/o Late Shri Prem Vallabh Sharma W/o Shri Arun Sharma, R/o Plot No. 5-6, Gayatri Nagar-I, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Jaipur.
4. Kamla Sharma W/o Late Shri Krishna Vallabh Sharma, R/o 24, Suraj Nagar East, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Died During The Proceedings) Respondents/Applicants No.1 to 4
5. State Bank Of India, Through Its Manager, Branch Gopalbadi, Jaipur.
6. State Bank Of India, Through Its Manager, Branch Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
7. State Bank Of India, Through Its Manager, Branch Sudarshanpura, Jaipur.
8. The Railway Employee Co-Operative Bank Limited, Through Its Manager, Branch Station Road, Jaipur.
9. State Bank Of India, Through Its Manager, Branch Sodala, Jaipur.
10. State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur, Branch Pwd Complex, Jacob Road, Civil Line, Jaipur. ----Proforma Respondents/Non-Applicants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Sharma for Mr. Aditya K. Mitruka For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 16/01/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:2128] (2 of 2) [CW-14552/2024] After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this civil writ petition. The civil writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/30