Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29503 (ALL)

RAJ NATH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/4982/2025 · 2025-03-17

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38688-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4982 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Nath Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prateek Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and Shri Ali Zaman Khan, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. 2. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the First Information Report dated 10.01.2025 registered as Case Crime no.0005/2025, under sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351(2) BNS 2023, Police Station- Kotwali City, District Mirzapur. 3. After substantial argument, once the court has declined to quash the impugned first information report, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner do not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with leave to invoke the remedy as available in law. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents have not objected the said prayer. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is aggrieved, he may avail the remedy as available in law. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 18.3.2025 A. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad