APHC010422322007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26051/2007 Between: 1. T. KOTESWAR RAO, NELLORE DISTRICT, S/O. K. RAMAIAH, MANAGER (RETIRED), NELLORE DISTRICT CO-OP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., NEAR GANDHI STATUTE, TRUNK ROAD, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COOP BANKLTD HYD 2OTS, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TROOP BAZAR, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. NELLORE DISTRICT COOP CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP BY ITS MANAGER, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and to declare the action of respondents in withholding the amounts due to petitioner for the period from 23-8-1995 to 31- 2-1997 on account of grant of pay parity as per provisions in Rule 73 of AP State Co-operative Rules, and consequent to revision of pay scales w.e.f. 01- 11-1992 and not making proportionate contribution to the provident Fund for the period as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to pay Rs. 1,32,676.00 payable as difference of salary for the period from 23-8-1995 to 31-12-1997 with interest at 18% per annum from the date of actual payment and to make propertionate contribution to the provident Fund account of the petitioner for the period from 23-8-1995 to 31-12-1997 with interest and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 33969 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forth with release Rs. 1,32,674.00 payable as difference of salary for the period from 23-8-1995 to 31-12-1997 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAVEEN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A H RAMA KRISHNA RAO (SC FOR APCOB) 2. D SETHURAMA REDDY 3. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR