IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16770/2025 Decided on: 19.11.2025 Krishan Lal …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Vinod Gupta, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 04/05.10.2024 (Annexure P-2) seeking applicability of Vikram Singh Vs. HRTC2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020, decided on 09.11.2023 2 within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 19th November, 2025(rohit)