- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21227 WP No. 17703 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 17703 OF 2025 (EDN-EX) BETWEEN: 1. PRAJWAL M., S/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/A M. VADDARA PALYA, JIGANI, BANGALORE - 560 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SRIKANTH N.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI - 580 025. 2. THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION), KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI - 580 025. 3. CHRIST ACADEMY INSTITUTE OF LAW, HULLAHALLI, JIGANI HOBLI, BEGUR KOPPA ROAD, SAKALAWARA POST, CHRIST NAGAR, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 083. REP. BY PRINCIPAL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GIRISH KUMAR R., LEARNED AGA FOR R1 And R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21227 WP No. 17703 of 2025 RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16.06.2025 AND 17.06.2025 AS PER ANNEXURE -A AND A1 THEREBY ISSUE EXAM ADMISSION LETTER IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri Girish Kumar R., learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to respondent Nos.1 and 3 to consider the representations dated 16.06.2025 and 17.06.2025 (Annexure-A and A1) and permit him to appear for the II Semester B.A.L. LL.B. (five years) examination, which is scheduled to be commenced from 22.06.2025. 3. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the averments made in the representation at Annexure-A, wherein the petitioner himself stated that he had only 46% attendance - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21227 WP No. 17703 of 2025 in the law course. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, interference at this stage would come in the way of the rules and regulations of the respondent- University and therefore, this Court declined to interfere with the shortage of attendance of the petitioner. In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Nitin Ranjan v/s Vishveshwaraiah Technological University and Another in W.P.No.53806/2014 dated 20.02.2015, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE CPN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3