[2025:RJ-JP:36517] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13641/2025 Vikram Singh Meena Adopted Son Of Shri Ramdev Meena, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Village Post Jadla, Tehsil Kathoomar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 4. District Collector, Alwar, Rajasthan. 5. Sub-Divisional Officer, Kathoomar, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Dushyant Gour & Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Government Senior Secondary School situated at Village Jadla, District Alwar was in a dilapidated condition, hence, for the safety of the children studying in the school, the petitioner surrendered his land for the purpose of construction of new building of school for children’s education. Counsel submits that a surrender deed was executed by the petitioner in favour of the school and the respondents on 11.10.2021, but in spite of passing of more than four years, till date, no action has been taken by the Authorities concerned for raising construction of the school building for the purpose of children’s education. [2025:RJ-JP:36517] (2 of 2) [CW-13641/2025] 2. Counsel submits that after getting possession of the subject land, the respondents have started using the land in question for the purpose of cultivation and the school has been shifted to rental premises. Counsel submits that instead of raising construction on the subject land, the respondents are using the land for their personal use by way of cultivation. 3. Counsel submits that prior to filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner had approached the Authorities concerned by way of filing a representation and notice for demand of justice, but no heed has been paid, hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondents, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition with a direction the respondent-Authorities to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and do the necessary exercise as required under the law. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /42