1 2025:CGHC:45940 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2079 of 2016 1 - Satish Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Dewangan, Aged About 37 Years Assistant Teacher Municipal, Presently Working At Govt. Primary School Baloda Sader, Nagar Panchayat Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sumit Kumar Tamboli S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Tamboli, Aged About 30 Years Assistant Teacher Municipal, Presently Working At Govt. Primary School Baloda Sader, Nagar Panchayat Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shiv Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Nanki Ram Sahu, Aged About 46 Years Assistant Teacher Municipal, Presently Working As Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School Baloda, Nagar Panchayat Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Neera Dewangan W/o Shri Kapil Narayan Dewangan, Aged About 39 Years Assistant Teacher Municipal, Presently Working At Govt. Girls Primary School Budhwari Bazar Baloda, Nagar Panchayat Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Ku. Suvidha Singh D/o Shri Jai Prakash Singh Aged About 26 Years Assistant Teacher Municipal, Presently Working As Govt. Primary School Kumharpara Baloda, Nagar Panchayat Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.09.10 10:17:19 +0530 2 Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondents : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 09/09/2025 1. On 25.08.2025 and today also no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners even in the second round. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu