Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29484 (ALL)

NADEEM ALI v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/9364/2025 · 2025-03-19

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40431 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9364 of 2025 Applicant :- Nadeem Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Brajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.646 of 2024, under Sections 308(5), 55, 115(2) B.N.S., P.S. Ramgarh, District Firozabad, during pendency of the trial. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He next argued that identically placed co-accused, namely, Tarik, Raja @ Rashid and Pinki Kinnar have been granted bail by this Court and Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 17.03.2025 and 03.03.2025 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application Nos.2496 of 2025, 2626 of 2025 and 1591 of 2025, respectively. He further submits that since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 30.10.2024. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial. 4. On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and the fact that the case of the applicant is similar to that of co-accused, who have been granted bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant, Nadeem Ali be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (ii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad