APHC010421862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21493/2025 Between: 1. MV RAMAKRISHNA KISHORE, S/O SURANARAYANA MURTY, OF 2025 AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC ADVOCATE, R/O SRWA511, 5TH LANE 2ND STREET, SRINAGAR COLONY, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, MUTYALAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME-DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA ,NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATYANARAYANAPURAM POLICE STATION SATYANARAYANAPURAM, MUTYALAMPADU VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATYANARAYANAPURAM POLICE STATION SATYANARAYANAPURAM, MUTYALAMPADU VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 5. BOKKISAM RAJA SEKHAR, S/O RAMARAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/O NIRMALA APARTMENTS 439/GF3, ROAD NO.7, BANKCOLONY SRINIVASANAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DSTRICT 2 6. RAAMISETTY SABITADEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O NIRMALA APARTMENTS 439/GF3, ROAD NO.7 BANKCOLONY SRINIVASANAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 7. RAMISETTY JULIAN NAIDU, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/O NIRMALA APARTMENTS 439/GF3, ROAD NO.7 BANKCOLONY SRINIVASANAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 to harassing the petitioner by calling to the police station to arrest the petitioner without registering the any crime against the petitioner and without any notice and without following the due process of law by the influence of the 5 to 7 respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondents No.2 to 4 not to call the petitioner to the police station without any notice and without following the due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents No.2 to 4 not to call the petitioner to the police station without any notice and without following the due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JESHTADI SUNIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21493 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 in harassing the petitioner by calling to the police station to arrest the petitioner without registering the any crime against the petitioner and without any notice and without following the due process of law by the influence of the respondent Nos.5 to 7 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and also in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to call the petitioner to the police station without any notice and without following the due process of law…” 2. Heard Sri Jeshtadi Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the 6th respondent sent a representation to the Commissioner of Police, NTR Police Commissionerate, NTR District through PGRS. The same was endorsed to the SHO, SN Puram P.S., vide NTR202507072833 dated 07.07.2025, for enquiry and take necessary action. He would further submit that the 4th respondent called both parties for preliminary enquiry. After due enquiry, it came to light that the matter is related to civil disputes. The respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station, since, no crime has been registered against him. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.08.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21493 of 2025 Dated.20.08.2025 UPS 110