IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.426 of 2023 Decided on 28th October, 2025 Vidya Sharma …Petitioner Versus Sh. Divesh Kumar and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rohan Tomar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner would be well advised to raise the issue which has been raised by way of this contempt petition by way of a fresh proceedings. 2 2. Learned Senior Counsel on instructions submits that these proceedings be closed but with liberty to the petitioner to assail the cause raised by way of this contempt petition by way of a fresh writ petition. 3. Proceedings are closed with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge October 28, 2025 (Vinod)