[2025:RJ-JP:38874] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11429/2025 1. Gajendra S/o Gangaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Data Motipura, Police Station Mothpur, Tehsil Atru, District Baran (Raj.) 2. Puranmal S/o Gangaram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Data Motipura, Police Station Mothpur, Tehsil Atru, District Baran (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In Sub Jail Atru District Baran) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP, Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.98/2025 registered at Police Station Mothpur, District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He further submits that except one grievous injury, all other injuries [2025:RJ-JP:38874] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11429/2025] are simple in nature. He argues that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that petitioners are in custody since 14.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that cross-cases have been registered between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries; except one grievous injury, all other injuries are simple in nature; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Gajendra S/o Gangaram, and 2. Puranmal S/o Gangaram shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the [2025:RJ-JP:38874] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11429/2025] matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/98