HAFIZA BEGUM v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/927/2025 · 2025-04-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2947 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2947 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 927/2025
Hafiza Begum
..... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Gourab Sharma, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 21.04.2025
After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file fresh petition. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 21.04.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 42 Mihul Singh 2025.04.21 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document