[2025:RJ-JP:38772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14270/2025 1. Ramveer Singh S/o Shri Bhoop Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Gram Harnera, Thana Nadbai, District Bharatpur. Presently Posted As Constable Driver Belt No. 232, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.). 2. Badri Singh S/o Shri Kalua Ram Meena, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Gram Dhanota, Thana Se ver, District Bharatpur. Presently Posted As Constable Driver, Belt No. 210, District Dholpur (Raj.). 3. Ransingh S/o Sualal Meena, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Gram Badapura, Thana Masalpur, District Sawaimadhopur. Presently Posted As Head Constable Driver Belt No. 1680, District Karauli (Raj.). 4. Ranjit Singh S/o Prahlad Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Gram And Post Salimpur Via Hindaun Tehsil Todabheem, District Sawaimadhpur. Presently Posted As Head Constable Driver Belt No. 1679 District Karauli (Raj.). 5. Shivcharan S/o Shri Jairam, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Alipur, Post Khoh, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg. Presently Posted As Head Constable Band Belt No. 53, District Karauli (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Financial Advisor, Police Headquarter, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Sawaimadhopur. 5. The Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur 6. The Superintendent Of Police, Karauli ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:38772] (2 of 2) [CW-14270/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishi Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG, Ms. Kavita Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Prncipal Seat, Jodhpur, vide judgment dated 20.12.2023 passed in Amar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1. Therefore, they prayed that the writ petition be decided and disposed of in a similar terms. 2. In view of the above consensus, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the directions issued in Amar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (Supra). 3. The petitioners shall be entitled for the same benefits which have been granted in the aforesaid judgment delivered by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Amar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (Supra). 4. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/14 1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3873/2019